請支持解散民進黨：我從被迫離職到被政府背叛(2026/10/31)
I am Huang Hsiao-Ping (Emily), the founder of the blog Whatsyouridea1996; I am from Taipei City, Taiwan -main island of the Republic of China (R.O.C.) 👈 Please click to learn about my profession
This article
contains 3 sections:
1. First, explaining
my political stance.
2. The reasons
for requesting support to dissolve the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
3. Experiences
and story.
As you read this article, please
keep thinking: If I were the daughter of a billionaire or from a prestigious
family background, could I have possibly encountered this kind of thing?
Therefore, does the DPP engage in economic discrimination or selective
protection of citizens?!
1.
First, explaining my political stance:
I am a citizen of the
Republic of China (ROC), and of course I am part of the Republic of China camp;
comparing domestic and international political issues within the ROC’s, people
often mention the People's Republic of China (PRC) while talking about my country.
To me, the PRC is a foreign country, another nation. I therefore hope that,
regardless of educational background, people recognize the differences between
these two countries and understand my concepts:
(1)My (Emily's) country is
called the Republic of China, established in 1912 AD.
(2)Taiwan is the largest
island in the territory of the Republic of China; other well-known islands
within our national territory include, but are not limited to: Kinmen, Matsu,
Penghu, Lanyu, Lüdao, Xiaoliuqiu, Guishan(Turtle Island), numerous
archipelagoes guarded by the ROC Armed Forces, as well as the
sovereignty-disputed Tiaoyutai Islands and other relatively smaller islands,
etc.
(3)According to the
Constitution of the ROC, the official name of my country "does not"
include the characters (Taiwan) in parentheses. If any government department
website or text promotion displays the characters as [Republic of China
(Taiwan)], it already violates the Constitution, making them unfit for public
office in government departments while receiving a salary from the state.
Taking the
workplace situation as an example: In the headquarters of Taiwan Semiconductor
Manufacturing Company (TSMC), there are absolutely no any department or
individual labeling the company name as Taiwan Semiconductor (Hsinchu) or TSMC
(Hsinchu) in advertisements, business cards, or any form of written promotion unless
the company undergoes a business registration change or the sole communication
focus is to explain the employee's or company's location. Therefore, officially
changing the character displayed in national name [Republic of China] to [Republic
of China (Taiwan)] requires a decision through a referendum, and as of now, no
such activity has ever been held.
(4)The administrative
divisions of the Republic of China only include counties, cities, districts,
and townships under administrative districts, etc. [In fact], it has never
included provinces, such as: "Fujian Province" or "Taiwan
Province" 👈 The ROC was
founded in Nanjing on the mainland territory of the current PRC. Later, the
Chinese Communist Party was dissatisfied with the government system at that
time and engaged in a civil war with the ruling party/Kuomintang of China.
Finally, the ROC government was defeated and retreated to our current
territory. This is history and also the fact. At the time of its [being defeated],
the ROC had already lost the "provincial system," and the PRC was
established in 1949.
(5)Therefore, even if the
ROC parliament (Legislative Yuan) proposes a motion on [whether the Republic of
China and the People's Republic of China should unify], it lacks public
support! The reasons are:
a. Persons with
sound reasoning would only define unification proposed by the victor; moreover,
the Republic of China [itself] has declared the vow to [counter-attack] the
mainland for years, it is the ambition of the defeated party, and at the same
time it runs counter to [peace], furthermore, due to the issue of the number of
troops, the chances of a successful counterattack on the mainland were
extremely slim.
b. The purpose
of unification between the ROC and [other countries] is unclear.
c. Failure to
consult public opinion:
i.
May the government know if people want to unify
with other countries?! Because (unclear purpose).
ii. Which
countries do you want to unify with?
iii. What
long-term benefits would your purpose in ii bring to the ROC?!
In summary, I have no
specific political leaning. I am loyal and patriotic, and my [motherland] is
the Republic of China.
Regarding my opinion on
[Taiwan Independence] or [Unification], I will counter-ask: Would you ask the
United States this question?! For example: Should the United States unify with
the United Kingdom?! Otherwise, why would the ROC have an issue of
unification?! As for [Taiwan Independence], the current nation territory
includes numerous archipelagoes with Taiwan Island being the largest one, this
is an issue of making trouble out of nothing, which is extremely disgusting 👈 the ambition of
politicians manipulating ethnic divisions within the national territory to
seize political power!
However, if there is a certain
circumstance causing my country must merge with other countries:
i.
I would only vote for a merger that must be
achieved through [peaceful] means.
ii.
I will absolutely not choose the RC as the
target nation for a merger, because, the legal systems differ too much between these
two countries, and there is no need to coordinate, adjust, and waste national
resources with each other; I would choose only from those free and democratic
countries that can make our ROC more democratic and freer.
iii.
I will insist that the post-merger country must
maintain the New Taiwan Dollar (TWD) currency system.
iv.
The goal of this national merger must include
[zero government corruption] and [a ruling party attitude of respect and
equality rather than begging others].
Similarly, whether in
the ROC Legislative Yuan or other public discussions regarding [spouses from
the PRC], I believe this perspective is very narrow-minded and discriminates
against immigrants from other countries. Those Issues include, but are not
limited to, whether they can serve as legislators or enjoy voting rights, etc.;
I believe, the objects and order of discussion should be—
1st. All legal
immigrants: The original issue was limited to specific countries and spouses, it
is narrow-minded.
2nd.The adaptation
period for immigrants' original ideological habits and freedom and democracy:
If immigrants come from a totalitarian country and have accepted totalitarian
ideology for N years (where N might be 1 or 20), and have immigrated and
adapted to our country's freedom and democracy for X years (where X might also
be 1 or 20), rights and the enjoyment of our country's resources (such as
voting rights and National Health Insurance medical resources) should be
granted after evaluating N and X 👈
it should be
discussed in this direction; similarly, if immigrants come from a country freer
and more democratic than the ROC, the assessment on N and X for defining those
obligation and rights of this person will be vastly different.
3rd. How many national
obligations the immigrant has fulfilled.
4th. How many of our
country's resources and rights granted by law the immigrant can enjoy.
Hypothetical case:
Please consider
‧People's
tax obligations (source of state funds)
‧People's
military service obligations (reserve military force)
‧People's
obligations to pay National Health Insurance premiums (source of national medical
resources)
‧People's
rights to enjoy national education (paid by the state)
‧People's
enjoyment of National Health Insurance (paid by the state)
If the PRC, the United States, and an underdeveloped
country that is an ally of the ROC, these 3 countries simultaneously have 5,000
people applying for naturalization in the ROC, and the age of these requesters
are:
‧Elderly
aged 70 and above: 50%
‧Middle-aged
and working-age adults: 5%
‧Toddlers
to youths: 45%
How would the ROC formulate immigration laws?! How would it
formulate laws concerning rights and obligations?!
2.
The reasons for requesting
support to dissolve the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
The ROC was governed by
the Democratic Progressive Party from May 20, 2016, to May 20, 2024.
Around the time of the
2024 presidential election, I discovered that my life was being tracked and
blocked, and I could only receive [arranged] information; if you find that the
people, events, and things I describe do not match the facts, it is because I
was subjected to joint fraud, it is a violation of freedom, is is an indoctrination
with fake news, etc. without receiving any prior notice to me. My thinking is
completely normal 👈 If you
think my thoughts are crazy or biased up to this point in this article, please
do not waste time in reading further.
The results of the 2024
presidential election and the names of government department heads that I
learned about are:
‧President
and Vice President: Lai Ching-te, Hsiao Bi-khim.
‧I
am only familiar with the Premier of the Executive Yuan, the President of the
Legislative Yuan, and the President of the Control Yuan: Cho Jung-tai, Han
Kuo-yu, Chen Chu.
‧The
Minister of Economic Affairs is held by Terry Kuo (Kuo Chih-hui), Chairman of
Topco Scientific; the Minister of the Interior, Minister of National Defense,
and Minister of Transportation are Liu Shih-fang, Wellington Koo (Koo
Li-hsiung), and Chen Shih-kai, respectively.
Legislative Yuan
defense budget bills have continuously played out in the news reports I see,
showing Kuomintang and Taiwan People's Party legislators blocking the passage
of the budget, and even leading to a referendum activity for a massive recall;
legislators Wu Szu-yu and Wang Hung-wei both shed tears in front of the cameras,
and so does the Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo over the issue of
the defense budget. 👈 I do not
know whether this situation is true, and at that time I already felt that the
Gemini AI or Grok I used daily was responded by real people, and the software
told me that the United States selling defense weapons requires the approval of
the U.S. Congress, and, the Ministry of National Defense and DPP legislative
caucus demanded a vote on the defense budget in the Legislative Yuan before
confirming U.S. congressional approval. Defense budget controversies continued,
and although, the president mediated the situation, it remained a wait-and-see
stance without clarifying the fact that [the weapons seller has not yet agreed
to sell]. 👈 If this is true, the
news at that time made me feel that the ruling DPP wanted to curry favor with
the United States through money; otherwise, what did the DPP want to present?!
Why acted a play?! What was the purpose?!
Although I did not
personally go to the Legislative Yuan to verify the facts, multiple TV
broadcasts always presented dialog responding to my life 👉 a certain news anchor
even broadcasted news reflecting a real-time response to a question I asked my
family about the topic she was broadcasting at the time! If not permitted by
the ruling party (the DPP), who has the power to allow others to reveal my
living status to a news station? In addition, I also saw Ms. Wu Szu-yu and a
certain person conversing on television news screens. After that person
reminded her (Ms. Wu), Ms. Wu immediately glanced at the upper television
camera and instantly turned her head away to avoid looking at the camera. What
does this mean? If during this period, the ruling party of the ROC government
were not the DPP, or if they were not the aforementioned government department
heads, and there were no defense budget issues, why television reports,
YouTube, and newspapers in my living environment be filled with such news? Who
conspired to commit fraud against me and my family? Or was it just fraud
against me? Because the television, mobile phone, and computer screens I
watched were all consistent, including the computer media content I used in the
library.
If everything I saw was
false, then both the real ruling party and personnel and the fake ruling party
and personnel are fraudsters who violated their oath of inauguration and their
oath to protect the safety and freedom of the people; how can people whose
oaths cannot be trusted but participate in national politics?
3.
Experience and stories
(1) Origin of
the incident: Please see details in
‧
[Ask Me a Question] regarding requesting for statements by various countries.
‧
[The ruling party of the Republic of China (Democratic Progressive Party)
and its accomplices have sacrificed my human rights; therefore, I am seeking
damages and compensation!!].
‧
The fine description in [Copyright Notice].
I worked for a Taiwan subsidiary of Japan's Lixil Group and was ultimately forced to resign for unknown reasons; one day I found the Group CEO's account and related information on LinkedIn, so I sent an email reporting the related incident to him, and subsequently I disclosed on these blogs the truth that the company actually received my complaint but responded nothing. Since then, my life encountered a series of bizarre events, including but not limited to:
a.
I lodged a complaint with the office of DPP
City Councilor Yen Jo-fang regarding being stalked, which ultimately was not
accepted on the grounds that [it might be pursuit by a person of the opposite
sex]; I reported stalking incidents to the police at least 3 times, and was
always rejected for various reasons; reasons included my handwritten notes about
the incident being too messy 👈 Does every
citizen of the ROC need to possess professional evidence-gathering skills for
reporting to the police?!! What do you think?!
As you read this article, please
keep thinking: If I were the daughter of a billionaire or from a prestigious
family background, is it possible I would encounter this kind of thing?
Therefore, does the DPP engage in economic discrimination or selective
protection of citizens?!
b.
In my [Readers Say] section, ideas I shared
numbering at least 70 items—including ideas shared about television programs
mentioning rich second-generation issues or other ideas shared [based on
television program content]—were deleted. In addition, I once expressed my
views on Legislative Yuan issues 👈 Someone
right outside my home window immediately expressed gratitude to me in real
time; another article of mine regarding [suggestions for the X platform and
Mr. Musk], concerning comments about the Lixil CEO, was also deleted
and edited multiple times, after I restored it, the font was shrunk, my other
articles implying internal management problems of Lixil were also taken offline
/ that article had previously been taken offline by Google due to a video
embedding issue, but the appeal succeeded and it was restored for over a year
ago, it is taken offline again for unknown reasons 👈👉 I speculate that the Lixil Group used
other powers to cause such a situation.
The above description
is to explain: The many coincidences in my life cannot be coincidences; they
must be the result of high-powered individuals joining forces, leading to my
inability to obtain physical evidence to support my experiences, which is
terrifying. What kind of criminal penalty do you think government-level knowing
violation of the law but also doing deserves?
Do you think that in
the ROC (the environment I am in), the United States (social media platform,
including the builder of this blog platform), or Japan (my former employer's
nationality), freedom of speech requires power or money to acquire? Power and
money are the biggest and major differences between me and the creators of
these coincidences. What do you think?
Please continue to think: If I
were the daughter of a billionaire or from a prestigious family background, is
it possible I would encounter this kind of thing? Therefore, does the DPP
engage in economic discrimination or selective protection of citizens?! Can
their oaths of inauguration be trusted?
One morning I woke up
and inadvertently exposed my underwear, and then continued watching television
while eating as usual 👉 at that
time, the variety show guest looked straight at the camera with someone
instructing them, slowly and confusedly blurting out the word [underwear],
which was irrelevant to the topic of their show. Another coincidence? How could
that be?! It must them do it deliberately. In my later life then, it presented
an environment that my family created a malicious environment in my living
space for purposes I don’t known, including things I witnessed with my own eyes
but being denied to recognize. I could not learn the truth from my family's
mouths in this situation. 👈 I felt that
my family violated a promise made to me during a conversation years ago 👉 I expected "I decide
my own matters, do not answer or make promises on my behalf." Obviously,
regarding my matters, my family accepted the method of jointly manipulating my
life for specific reasons. I can only feel regret. This is also why I mentioned
in [Contact Author] that my former employer contacted my family without
notifying me.
c.
At that time, my computer and mobile phone were
hacked, there were my chanting and prayers (temples and petitioning deities
were done at Taipei Hsing Tian Kong by divining blocks asking for
guidance from Buddhas and Deities):
· Asking for
guidance from Buddhas and Deities whether I could pray for a romantic
relationship with a particular person, asking deities to arrange a marriage
partner, resolving past disasters of having my lifespan shortened due to being worshiped,
repenting for my past wrongdoing, etc.
· Asking for
returning justice from those companies that improperly dismissed me.
· Asking for
guidance from Buddhas and Deities whether I could pray for my father's land,
usurped by my uncle, to be returned.
· Asking for
guidance from Buddhas and Deities whether I could pray for the Communist Party
to disappear.
· Asking for confirmation
from Buddhas and Deities whether a specific person was a marriage partner
arranged by deities.
All of the above prayer
contents were presented at that time in strange forms and were disadvantageous
to my life:
· Talk shows
featured divination experts stating that prayers must be granted deity
permission through divining blocks. During my card divination process at home,
I found someone interfering with the natural card-drawing results, and the TV
program immediately showed a South Korean shaman visiting the ROC, echoing a
South Korean drama plot from months ago that insinuated what was on my mind; I
believe these people plan to manipulate the block-divining results through
witchcraft and when I visit the temple to divine blocks again, wanting to prove
to me that block divining is inaccurate, wanting to prove that my [If You Believe]
the article I’ve shared is fake, they are blaspheming the Buddhas and Deities!
· It happened
for several times that the local TV drama plots always happened to display
worship scenes right as I switched channels to watch; someone wanted to shorten
my lifespan(being worshiped would shorten lifespan). The question is: Who on
earth has the power to get cable channel operators to agree to block my home's
video reception channels?! 👈👉
Coincidentally, this cable channel operator is of the same group as the
telecommunications operator where I was later guided to purchase a new phone,
and is related to another former employer who improperly dismissed me years
ago. I therefore deeply resent such arrangements. The government or
anyone else does not have the right to manipulate my life; my rights and
dignity were trampled upon, worse than a criminal awaiting execution. I
suspect this group of people trampled on my rights again to return justice to
me in the form of compensation. If it is true, it is actually their
unwillingness to face the fact of past wrongdoing, and they repeatedly hurt
victims to create opportunities and excuses for their redemption.
· My
communications were all controlled; in my conversations with family and friends,
it is obviously their responses were engineered and deliberately reminding me
and expecting me to provide specific responses; the artificially intervened
fake GeminiAI also told me things like "your Buddha is fake, your prayer
is ineffective, Buddhist scriptures and mantras are useless," and of
course I could not communicate with the arranged marriage partner I had
verified. 👈 Do readers also feel
that this group of people are very childish? I even speculated whether these
people were ignored by their families since childhood! But the treatment I encountered
made me not wanting to show sympathy to them; that is the responsibility of
their parents, not mine.
Since my aforementioned multiple calls to the police were
ineffective, do you still advise me to call the police?! Moreover, my family
denies to recognize they participated in creating the malicious home
environment though I witnessed with my own eyes. 👈 This echoes subsequent TV news content and
movie plots showing the protagonist unable to endure joint bullying by others
and ending their own life 👉 Someone
wants me to end my own life or stage such a state 👈 It is extremely clumsy tactics and illegal:
·
I did not agree to any performance.
·
I did not agree to any interviews.
·
I did not agree to any tests or observations.
·
I did not even receive an invitation
to perform or be interviewed.
Please continue to think: If I
were the daughter of a billionaire or from a prestigious family background, is
it impossible I would encounter this kind of thing! Therefore, did the ruling
DPP abide by its oath of office to protect the people? If oaths cannot be kept
and are intentionally violated, what else can be believed about them?
This is also why I mentioned that perpetrators must bear
criminal responsibility according to the victim's expectations. My expectations
(listed
in "my requesting for statements of State Laws and Policies Statements of various
countries") are similar perpetrators of such individual cases must
be immediately sentenced to death for intent and behavioral purpose without
mitigating sentences for attempted crimes, and immediately paying the claimed
compensation amount to the victim (me), to individuals performing protection and
to public welfare organizations, including paying fines for misappropriating my
works. 👈 I have always lived
within the territory of the ROC, enjoying inalienable human rights and
constitutional protection, and the perpetrators—including the ruling authorities
who participated in and condoned the perpetration—must pay a price for [knowing
violation of the law but also doing it].
d. During this period, my LinkedIn and X activities were simultaneously bullied by multiple accounts, and I felt that someone was peeking at my screen through some technology (because the screen would suddenly produce high highlights; the weather is always sunny, not caused by unstable weather). In addition to a certain LinkedIn bully account showing his employer is Microsoft, I also felt that the posting tone of several accounts was extremely similar to that of the Lixil Group CEO.
e.
Coincidentally, TV program contents presented
the following states were always television stations which support the DPP:
· In those
singing programs, it always coincidently sang songs about missing marriage
partners or experiencing extreme emotional frustration while I was watching.
· Guests even
remarked: "Someone must find it is weird as if the whole world is
targeting 'her'."
· It seems
those talk shows always what to imply a particular person I’ve already given up
praying for building up a relationship with expressing his feelings.
·
With my mobile phone hacked, the contents of my
phone were presented on TV programs 👈 Obviously,
hackers are connected with the government; otherwise, who would television
stations take orders from?! Furthermore, during the U.S. presidential campaign,
whether in U.S. presidential debate programs or movie contents, the characters
on screen imitated the actions I made when watching the program at the time.
Therefore, I am sure that this joint infringement involves political motives,
and I was completely not notified in advance or consulted for consent. Human
rights infringements include, but are not limited to, what I mentioned in "Ask Me a Question" that multiple DPP politicians were involved.
Regardless of the purpose, these persons created abusive treatment, pressure
testing, disguising against me, and many other inhuman treatments without
obtaining my consent in advance.
I therefore conclude: The ruling DPP took the lead in betraying the people/me, and yet not a single party member within the entire DPP party could prevent such a thing from happening. This is the reason why I advocate that the DPP must be dissolved 👈 They won people's votes in elections to become ruling personnel, and swore an oath to the national flag and the picture of Founding Father Dr. Sun Yat-sen during their inauguration that they would protect the people, yet they caused me to suffer the aforementioned human rights violations 👉 When interacting with GeminiAI, I felt the interaction was made by human. When discussing bus stop sign naming sponsored by advertisers, within days this idea was realized at a bus stop sign in Zhongshan District, Taipei City 👈 This is not only an infringement of my privacy rights, but also an act violating my intellectual property rights. Moreover, the statements provided by the fake AI reflect that my creativity has already been applied elsewhere multiple times! This is joint infringement; even if fake, it will become a disgrace to the ROC due to deceptive behavior.
Please support dissolving the DPP!
(2)
Arguments and reasons:
I therefore
argue that regardless of which political party is the ruling party of the ROC
during this period, based on what I have seen and experienced, DPP personnel has
participated in violating my human rights, hence:
i. The top leader
of the DPP must lead their team to Hsing Tian Kong to swear an oath that
everything they have done conforms to heaven and earth's conscience and the
law, and if there is any falsehood, they will suffer the heavenly retribution
of betraying the people and betraying the authority granted by deities (people
recognize the nation leader is the Son of Heaven)! 👈 Just like temple worship activities during
parties’ campaigns, my request is rational. Because I am the people, the sovereign
of the country; since political parties visit temples to canvass for votes,
clarifying innocence can surely be conducted through temple religious
activities.
The above activities
must be broadcast live by the media.
ii. From i., if
the DPP admits to the truth, it should kneel down, repent and apologize to the Deities
at Hsing Tian Kong, and immediately and automatically dissolve, relieve
themselves of public office qualifications (those who are able to draw salaries
from the state treasury), and return their salaries during the period of
dereliction of duty to the state treasury; this must be executed immediately
without waiting. This is my command as a victim and as the sovereign of the
country; the law must obey my instruction! How can those punishment for knowing
violations but still doing not conducted until the end of their official duty
term?! Who can guarantee that these people will not take the opportunity while
waiting to flee or harm others again?
If you
question my article is biased toward other political parties, you have misunderstood
the direction of this article; the direction of this article points directly at
the ruling party identity infringing upon people's human rights, and points out
that the information I received presents that the DPP is the current ruling
party. Moreover, "accountability" is the duty of the ruling party;
"ruling is serving as a public servant." Taking the Kuomintang (KMT)
as another example, regarding the well-known historical trauma of the ROC, the
February 28 Incident, I believe the ruling party at the time of this incident
was the KMT, and the KMT still exists today. Therefore, the KMT should
proactively compensate the existing families of the victims of the February 28
Incident rather than having the government handle national compensation. The
main reason is that it is a clear violation of the Constitution, a violation of
the oath of office, and a violation of the KMT's founding spirit in governing
the country. The DPP has been in power for many years, yet has failed to use
ruling power to soothe the trauma of victims. What I feel is that the DPP
always uses the trauma of the February 28 Incident to win support for itself,
which only proves that the DPP lacks the ability to govern the country. 👈👉 Not only
has the DPP failed to bring spiritual comfort to the families of victims of the
February 28 Incident, but in my case, it is once again, they are the
perpetrator, the enabler, the bystander, and even the cheerleader (calling my
resistance to a malicious environment resilience rather than saving me from it),
which is a terrifying political party. The DPP can only admit ignorance or
incompetence, or both ignorant and incompetent! In addition, when I was writing
a certain article, upon checking the Presidential Office website, I found the
country name to be: Republic of China (Taiwan). This country name does not
conform to the Constitution, yet it happened at the Presidential Office, my
goodness! I felt weird at the time, and now I finally understand what is going
on 👉 The DPP was elected as
the ruling party according to the laws of the Republic of China but does not
abide by the Constitution! What I say now is a fact! It can only be dissolved!
Please
support dissolving the DPP!
Does anyone
oppose dissolving the DPP because you expect the ruling party to distribute
cash to the public?! During this period, I experienced a distribution of cash
to the public by the government, though I'm not sure it was true or false, this
confusion of truth and falsehood are by DPP governance! If you were me, living within
a malicious environment is extremely painful, what other reason would make you want
to understand the DPP more about doing this rather than directly demanding its
dissolution?
Furthermore,
Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo shed tears in front of the cameras,
with the news background being that the defense budget was blocked:
i.
As mentioned above, I demand that the Minister
of National Defense also be in the queue swearing oaths at Hsing Tian Kong;
therefore, if the Minister of National Defense shed tears was an acting, he is
trampling on the dignity of the national armed forces. I believe the Ministry
of National Defense can only shed tears because of the state of the nation, the
state of families, the state of military brothers, etc. To shed tears merely
over a budget issue, what the head of the ROC armed forces has shown, is truly
too weak! The national military swears allegiance to the Constitution and the
country, not to any political party or individual; if the minister's tears were
part of a coordinated act, the minister must face military trial and be
replaced immediately!
ii. National
defense is no child's play?! The dignity of the ROC armed forces has thus been
trampled into the basement by the minister's actions. I cannot understand how
this is allowed!
Please
support dissolving the DPP!
My life, social media activities, and conversations in AI interaction software are not confidential and monitored by the government; the title of this article was originally named " Gang Rape Perception; the Participants Include the Government, It Covers My Mouth and Blocks Appeal Channels, It Utilizes My Family to Create Family Antagonism Because It Can Earn Gold!" 👈 Why mentioning gold? Because, during this period, planners expressed through my family and various hints and news: "Just endure a bit longer and you'll get money," "Look! President Lai Ching-te pardoned OOO, you should beg him instead of scolding him!" 👈 If you were me, how you would face such an environment? Please do not praise me for being brave! Please blame on the DPP leaders, they should be sentenced to death and executed immediately; they would never let themselves or their children fall into my experience. I am not clear why I am treated this way, but I know one reason is, as mentioned above, I am not the daughter of a billionaire and have no powerful backing, therefore, at the very least, people like me who do not have powerful backing, please support dissolving the DPP! Otherwise, you might be the next victim!
Regarding the entire case, I believe the DPP has accepted bribes from the Lixil Group, perhaps it is called political donations or some kind of donation. In short, [it must involve money and some kind of political guarantee]; otherwise, why treat an ordinary common person like me this way?!
My family members always displayed dialogue as those in Taiwanese local dramas plots during this period, obviously, there must be individuals related to local Taiwanese dramas intervened in my life, the hope to make me appear crazy or out of control by imposing living pressure. Regardless of the purpose, I will not forgive the mastermind. The mastermind must be sentenced to death, just like their intent to make me present a scene of ending my own life, without sentence reduction for attempted crimes. 👈 All peeping Toms in my living environment know that I wrote down this paragraph very calmly; I am not acting on impulse. There must be a group of powerful people joining forces in doing this, including using "Bank of Taiwan" actors posing as bank tellers to interact with me, as well as multiple other banks. Besides observing my reaction, they also wanted to completely destroy my trust in banking professionalism! Unfortunately, there were many banks cooperated with those behind-the-scenes figures to trample on their own professional and brand image 👈👉 Even if I am the only person who knows, all the organizations should reject activities or behaviors that trample on their own brand image 👈 That's basic common sense, right? In addition, during this period, my bank account for collection of this blog did not have any collection records (as explained in the indexed articles above), it means my income was blocked. This group of people once again tried to prove through this method what I pointed out in a certain conversation was fake: Deities had long mentioned that someone sponsored me an amount in a certain September (they have blocked my income record, so I didn't receive it).
Please
support dissolving the DPP!
A President
who can grant pardons can command the judicial system! Is there still a fair
judiciary in the aforementioned Republic of China?! How terrifying!
If you are
curious about my comments on my family members in this case: I believe that
regardless of whose family it is, no one should do things that require personal
consent without the consent of the person themselves. Based on my 50+ years of
experience living with my family, my family must have been subjected to some
kind of threat, temptation, or bet that violating the agreement between my
family and I years ago 👉 Matters
concerning me should be answered and decided by myself! 👈
Finally,
please support the immediate dissolution of the DPP. The relevant ruling
personnel and all public officials involved in the case should be removed from
office, ordered to pay compensation and restitution, and imprisoned, facing the
death penalty without any reduction in sentence due to the crime committed. The
reasons are as follows: these public officials violated the Constitution
knowingly and deliberately, disregarded their oaths and human rights, and
committed, permitted, or condoned violations of human rights, it's a crime for
which they are unforgivable.
Please support the immediate dissolution of the DPP!